Getting To Know You Better

PDL at Crawl Space

November 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Last week at Crawl Space’s closing party/opening reception, we stood outside in the dark with a bunch of art appreciators in an alley off Olive Way, behind a fence, next to a pick-up with speakers, looking down on the street. I really wish I had pictures to share. It was a compelling experience, beholding this performance by PDL.

A white, thirty-something man engaged with passers-by, wearing a mic. We up in the alley could hear his voice, coughs, muffled cursing, and whatever sounds were picked up from the people around him.  We watched him negotiate with friendly strangers as they cut the handcuffs that chained him to a pole. We watched his collection of pennies spill over the sidewalk and into the street. We watched a sweet man pick up the pennies while his companion went inside Starbucks to get a new bag for the pennies. PDL-man asked the sweet guy, “Is that guy with you?” and the sweet guy replied softly but quickly, “He’s my husband.”

That was the only interaction that didn’t elicit laughter from the audience. We laughed when the busker with the violin stopped “playing” her violin, yet the music didn’t stop. We laughed when she darted around stealing clutches of the dropped pennies, nimble and giddy. We laughed when PDL-man hunched over his pennies and grumbled, Bitch. She’s not even playing the fucking violin. We laughed when PDL-man stopped traffic to retrieve his pennies. And when the guys who cut the cuffs were happy and chummy to have helped out, offering their names and handshakes. We stood, in a crowd, and laughed. Yet no one noticed us.

I felt terribly embarrassed for the people who didn’t know they had an audience. I felt guilty that I was having a laugh at their expense. I felt like I’d pulled off some massive accomplishment of fate to have gotten myself on the right side of the fence.

There was this physical fence, but there was also a social/cultural fence that was between this audience and its unwitting spectacle.

The latter is stronger, and more divisive.

People understand the physical fence. In most arenas of practical jokes (such as Punk’d or Candid Camera), people understand that they were simply on the wrong side of the fence. It could have been anyone. At the end, they’re let in on the joke and everyone is on an equal footing again.

Whether we like to admit it or not, Art makes a social/cultural fence that is much more difficult to reconcile. By virtue of education and circumstance, people find themselves so firmly planted on one side that they simply can’t imagine what it would be like to be on the other side. This is the fence that stands between many groups of people and the open door of a contemporary gallery. We in the gallery say, “Look, engage! It’s so easy!” unable to imagine why various members of the “public” won’t cross the meager threshold. They, on the other hand, can’t imagine themselves going inside the gallery; nor what they’d find there; nor what they’d do with themselves once they got there.

I’ve talked to a few art-friends who were, momentarily, on the wrong side of the fence that night in Capitol Hill. They happened upon PDL-man and were engaged, unknowingly watched by an audience, and laughed at. While at first they felt embarrassed to have been put in this position, they ultimately felt secure enough on the right side of the cultural fence to take the hit for Art’s sake and celebrate it.

I’m not saying that this performance wasn’t good or interesting. Actually, I thought it was amazing. The real-time unfolding of the world as a theatre was nothing short of sublime. While Candid Camera and Punk’d share the prankster ethos, they certainly lack the Turner-scale sublimity. That evening, PDL fucked up the way we perceive the world, and the way we inhabit it. That is really hard to do.

From where I’m standing, I’m grateful for it.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Getting To Know You Better Poems: You’ve come to the right place!

November 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I’m pausing regular programming here on this blog to bring you. . .  what you’ve been asking for.

As you savvy readers probably know, when you sign up for a blog, you don’t only get an empty screen on which to collect your thoughts and fling them out into the world. You also get a cryptic, statistical representation of how your blog is used by said world. You can click on “blog statistics” and see what words people googled to arrive at your blog. Most commonly, the search terms are along the lines of: “dressed-up penis” or “nails in paintings” or “Jesus karaoke funny thing.” I suppose those are to be expected.

Unexpected –at least to me– have been the persistent pleas for “getting to know you better poems.” I’m talking a good TEN PERCENT of all total searches. I don’t know if it is one relentless poetry-starved googler who consistently forgets that he’s already clicked on my blog, or if it’s what lots of people are looking for— and then, sadly, not finding. Did you think that getting-to-know-you-better poetry was best left to romantic comedies with Shakespearian plot lines? Think again! I for one am rather touched that people are hungry for poetry as a means of getting to know their acquaintances and friendly-hopefuls.

So today, rather than disappoint yet another soul, I will offer you some getting to know you better poems.

Ahem.

{disclaimer: I know nothing about writing poetry.}

.

what’s that on your lip
some food
or maybe your ex
here like a booger
unbidden
unforgotten
and
dear

.

your hair falls from behind your ear
clumsily
effortlessly
each time like a giddy question
like a puppy
not knowing
when to
stop

.

maybe this elevator rendition of
and she was
is not so bad
if it gives us reason
to look up
give a knowing look
and smile
(did you fart?)

.

i think i know you from before
when you were who you are now
not who you were then
draped in black velvet
in the l.a. heat
you didn’t complain
always
pious

.

perhaps
if i knew you
we could paint our arms blue
(we would have many arms)
and sing in sanskrit
taking dutiful
pauses
to smirk
to
remember
our minds

.

easy masks
withheld words
your
teenage hair
keeps you
trying
.

here’s a bear hug
and here are babies clinging
here’s a hairy chest
and here’s a nipple leaking

.
nothing in your gorgeous laugh
betrays
that you come from
loss and
reverie
and staunch
hypocrisy

.

sweet boy.
(really a girl)
that hula hoop shimmies
between
two
worlds.
thank god
your parents are hippies

.

nothing says i love you
like pebbles
in the sand
nothing
says i want you like a
stone
in my hand
i think it has a smiley face

rock

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

George Washington Cannibalized

October 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

delosreyes

Tony de los Reyes, George Washington Cannibalized, 2009, ink and oil on linen, 35″ x 28″

This piece by Tony de los Reyes (at Howard House) captures a heart-sacking wallup of American mythology. In the U.S., George Washington’s head has become an omnipresent, iconic object that begs to be overlooked. In George Washington Cannibalized, he is alive with historical weight, and asking to be seen.

The black stains hiding the face have a disarming effect, warning the viewer that this isn’t the Santa Claus of American history we’ve all been taught to believe in. With careful, simple white lines drawn on Washington’s face, De los Reyes has evoked the power and weight of generations of spilled blood, annihilated cultures, broken promises, irrational fears, and the stories we’re all taught in history class.

What makes this painting brilliant is that De los Reyes has said all of this, and more, with a whisper. As is often the case with “political” art, it is the whisper that is heard the loudest.

delosreyes2

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Matthew Offenbacher at Howard House

October 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Having rendered myself a little embarrassed by my gushy post about Matthew Offenbacher before even seeing his show at Howard House, I thought I’d give it another go and try to articulate things a little better— even though I’ll probably be repeating stuff that’s already been said.

My tiny worry that the CAT paintings wouldn’t be as spectacular in person was assuaged the instant I walked through the door yesterday. I do think Jen Graves hit the nail on the head when she said “art is embarrassing” in her review of Matthew’s show.  He is painting things we contemporary artists aren’t supposed to want to paint: vases of flowers, cats, impressionistic brushwork. I believe his desire to paint these subjects is entirely sincere; but also, his license to paint them is granted partly by irony.  So maybe in a critical utopia where irony is dead, then this is its afterlife.

matthew1

Matthew Offenbacher, Untitled (detail), 2009, oil/acrylic/distemper on stainguard cotton

The paint is like light that seems to be barely touching the surface of this weird, unprimed yet stainguarded cotton. The colors and shapes have a fuzzy glow, and look like they could move and bounce off at any moment.

Laura

Laura Owens: Untitled, 2003, oil and acrylic on canvas, 165 x 147 cm; courtesy Douglas Hyde Gallery

There’s something that reminds me of Laura Owens— maybe it’s the fleeting sensibility. Often in the world of painting, the surface is worked and re-worked so that in the end the viewer is beholding this track of mark-making that made the painting what it is. Layers of history are evident. But with both Owens and Offenbacher, the history is somewhere else and all the viewer has is this one moment that was captured. What’s different is that Owens’ paintings often feel uncannily still, and Offenbacher’s are buzzing.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Following up with the coyotes

October 23, 2009 · 2 Comments

We’ve seen one of Seth Damm, Gina Coffman, and Kristin Ougendal’s performances, so I thought I’d write a bit about it. The first act of four, it was really unspectacular, in a good way. Rather than being an intense, extraordinary drama, it was a subtle vision you might be lucky enough to happen upon. Kind of like seeing a coyote.

coyotes1

The three were shifty, anxious teenagers hanging out by a tree. Maybe shy, or sulky, or in possession of some animal instinct directing their behaviour. They stood for a while, then walked through and out of the square with negotiated decisiveness that betrayed their uncertainty.

coyotes2

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Coyotes in Occidental Park in October

September 28, 2009 · 1 Comment

From June through October, Seattle’s Occidental Park has been the setting for ephemeral art works curated by artist Susie Lee and landscape architect Elizabeth Umbanhowar. Lee and Umbanhowar invited four teams of artists (one artist team for each month) to create site-specific work related to the writing of Haruki Murakami. October’s upcoming installment is by Gina Coffman, Seth Damm, and Kristin Ougendal.


A time-based narrative in four acts, the performances will feature coyotes in the form of the three artists wearing coyote mask/heads they created. The heads are stunning yet somber; evidently hand-made, yet transcendent. The coyotes are teenagers.


coyote 3





From the press release:


“In the spirit of a Haruki Murakami story these urban agents of transformation, trickery and transcendence will, in 4 acts, explore the fitness of Occidental Park, make preparations for a den and establish a liminal and wayward home.”

Wayward Home

Act One

In and Through

Friday, October 2nd, 4pm-dusk

Coyotes pass through the park taking stock, surveying and discovering a territory fit to inhabit.

Act Two

Egg and Wall

Tuesday, October 13th, 11:30am-1pm

The coyotes return to tidy-up the park accompanied by a restless house.

Act Three

Well House and Surrender House

Saturday, October 24th, 8-10pm

The coyotes find refuge and begin to build a den. Joined by the house they engage in the ritual of settling down, exploring internal environs and inviting you to do the same.

Act Four

Foundation and Transcendence

Saturday, October 31st, 6-9pm

In a final act the coyotes transcend their subterranean home. Restless again they parade out, away and into the night.


Also through the month of October will be a show of photographs by Seth Damm and Kristin Ougendal at All City Coffee in Pioneer Square. The photographs (taken by Damm) document the cross-country trek of the androgynous coyote (Ougendal) through awkward forest surrenders and graceful desert dislocation.


Opening reception October 1st 5-7 pm

All City Coffee

125 Prefontaine Pl S

Seattle


IMG_7672


→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

Studio Group

September 22, 2009 · 4 Comments

studiogroup

We’ve started a studio group here in Seattle. Anna and I had been wanting to participate in a group of artists that visited each others studios, so we decided to start one. I emailed local artists I already knew personally, as well as the members of SOIL and Crawl Space. People were very responsive, and a truly great group has taken shape. Members are: Saya Moriyasu, Troy Gua, Sharon Arnold, Laura Ward, Amanda Manitach, Damon Mori, Margie Livingston, Thom Heileson, Ryan Molenkamp, Etsuko Ichikawa, Joey Veltkamp, Anna Callahan, Susanna Bluhm.

manitachmeatruffAmanda Manitach

.

ichikawa-trace22006Etsuko Ichikawa

.

sharonSharon Arnold

.

joey
Joey Veltkamp
.

Drew Ernst

Laura Ward
.
GuaObamaFaceTroy Gua
.
ryanRyan Molencamp
.
anna2Anna Callahan
.
margieMargie Livingston
.
saya
Saya Moriyasu
.
heileson2Thom Heileson
.
yellowfield2
Susanna Bluhm
.
We wore mustaches at our first meeting.

studiogroup2{Troy Gua and Margie Livingston}

A lot of us hadn’t met before, so we introduced ourselves and our work. It was really great to see the variety of paths that brought each of us to this art community. Among us there are several high school dropouts, a former professional chef, a former engineer.

studiogroup3{Amanda Manitach, Joey Veltkamp, Sharon Arnold, Thom Heileson, Anna Callahan. Joey Veltkamp’s apartment was not on fire. I’m not sure why this photo came out like this!}

We’ll take turns hosting the studio visits, and the hosting artist will decide on the topic. We’ll talk about each others work, stuff we’re thinking about and reading, projects in early stages, etc.

Sometimes life as an artist can feel rather solitary. It can feel like you’re working alone in your studio in a kind of void. While that sensation is probably my favorite part of being an artist, I also feel the need for my work and my art practice to connect to a community that functions in a world. I think I’m in art not just for the making, but also for the being. It has something to do with the role I play as a worker in our culture, and the way I want to relate to other people.

This gathering felt more like a reunion than a first meeting.

studiogroup1

→ 4 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How do artists live?

September 15, 2009 · 8 Comments

I would love to go on some kind of massive research expedition to explore this very question. I want to know details about how other artists are making ends meet and making things work. I don’t know if it’s for commiseration or inspiration, or purely because no one ever talks about it. It was an unmentionable even in my grad school program, this “how to survive” issue. Is it because you don’t? Or at least not by doing art?  I’ve heard “There’s always teaching,” but really there isn’t. Teaching art at the college level is extremely competitive, and in order to get a stable teaching job, MFA graduates must first be willing to (typically) move anywhere in the country to adjunct part-time at near-poverty wages.

dalton_will_having_children{Jennifer Dalton, How Do Artists Live? 20-image slide show, detail, 2006}

Unless they are independently wealthy, artists have “day jobs,” right? As I’ve waded through several career crises in the past ten years, I’ve gathered that some day jobs seem to be more valuable than others, regardless of the income they yield. They have a higher romance factor, thereby enhancing the perception of the art career. Like: Zookeeper, Baker, Fireman, Roofer, Hair Stylist.  Then, other jobs seem like they would actually hinder an artist’s standing: Therapist, Nurse, Accountant, High School History Teacher. Is manual labor somehow better for the artist’s reputation? Is it the same for men as for women? Would it be cool to be a mailman delivering mail, but uncool to work in the post office proper? Does anyone know what I’m talking about?

How do you pay your bills?

Has having a child helped or hurt your art career?

Do your parents give you money?

Is there a day job you’d like to have, but haven’t pursued because it wouldn’t “look good?”

Do you like your day job? How did you get it?

jdalton{Jennifer Dalton, How Do Artists Live? 20-image slide show, installed at Winkleman Gallery, 2006}

→ 8 CommentsCategories: The Vulnerable Artist
Tagged: , ,

Alice Wheeler on Seattle, the wild west, the physical space of a woman, and Feminism.

September 10, 2009 · 1 Comment

I [yes, finally] listened to Jen Graves’ podcast of her interview with Alice Wheeler. Wow. The interview is more of a monologue, but it’s one that is wholly worthwhile. She said so many things that no one else seems to be saying; yet lots of people must be thinking about them, right?

I hadn’t realized that I have this idea of what the [contemporary] [female] [American] artist is supposed to be like. I hadn’t ever articulated it or heard it articulated before; at least not in this way. There’s this female artist template, and I’ve been sharing studio space with her all along. Negotiating.

There are conversations about feminism and what it means to be a female artist, but they are usually among feminists, and they are few and far between. If they make it into a larger arena, they seem to be bullied back into specificity so quickly that no response is required from the greater community.

Apparently I’m chickenshit because I can’t find the words to elaborate on my own experience as a female artist, nor bring myself to provide examples for any of the points I’m making. Sometimes it feels dangerous enough just writing this blog. Sometimes I’m struck with the thought that writing a blog about the art scene I’m participating in isn’t really what I’m “supposed” to be doing. I’m fairly certain it would have been safer to be quiet. Ah well, it’s too late for that.

→ 1 CommentCategories: The Vulnerable Artist
Tagged: , ,

Matthew Offenbacher

September 10, 2009 · 3 Comments

matthew4{Matthew Offenbacher, Untitled, 2009, from the series “Some new paintings of my cat and other things.”}

When I see a piece of [good] art, I’m usually struck by an excitement of ideas. I’m noticing that I think it’s good, and wondering why that is. I ponder the intent of the artist, and consider the way the piece is presented. I make connections between the work I’m studying and those of other artists.

Sometimes though, something entirely different occurs when I look at art. It happens very rarely, and when it does happen, the objects of my attention tend to be paintings. What happens is: I can not formulate a single cohesive thought, nor can I articulate anything. All I can do is look at the thing/painting and cuss like a teenager. Because it’s so good.

So, Matthew Offenbacher. DAMN.

matthew2

{Matthew Offenbacher, Medium Owl, 2006, from the series “God, sex, the great outdoors.”}

The thing with Matthew Offenbacher is that when I look at the sheer variety of his creative endeavors, my excitement over an individual work multiplies. In addition to painting, he also writes. Well. In addition to painting and writing well, he gathers artists and writing artists together in a unique and meaningful way. Most amazingly, all of his various projects are top notch.

matthew3{La Especial Norte, Second Issue, 2008}

I’ve been thinking about something Regina Hackett said on her blog post about Robert Yoder: “Not all artists can be as successfully chameleon as Bruce Nauman. Many best serve themselves by mining a single vein. Life is short. Art’s best chance of being long is internal coherence.”

Yeah, maybe if an artist is looking to secure the cultural memory of their career with the linearity of an ad campaign. Art that reproduces itself over and over (and over and over and over), simply out of habit on behalf of the artist and the audience, is boring. It beats you over the head with its self-proclaimed preciousness until you submit or run away. If I ever turn into that kind of artist, someone take my paints away and put me to work in a bakery. The best art is that which the artist simply had to do; not because it was the right career move; not because it’s consistent with past choices in materials and methods.  Offenbacher’s varied work breathes the crisp air of necessity, whether it’s a painting or a community project or piece of writing.

matthew1

{Matthew Offenbacher, Painting With Picture of Its Own Construction, 2005, from the series “Constructivist beavers.”}

This month Offenbacher begins Gift Shop at the Henry.

matthew7

He’s also a finalist for the Betty Bowen award. And he has a show coming up at Howard House.

And last but not least (and probably unrelated, yet not considered insignificant here at this blog called “Getting To Know You Better”), Matthew Offenbacher is a really nice person. I haven’t really met him; I only attended the Klatch that hosted him on the panel. As soon as he started talking, I was like, “WHO is this sweet guy??” He’s not fakey-polite; he just seems like a genuinely good person who looks for the good in people. It’s refreshing and unexpected, just like his work.

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Favorites
Tagged: , , , , ,